, the court appeared to begin with the presumption that "knowledge" standing by alone might mean both real knowledge or constructive knowledge. In determining that "knowledge" suggests only precise knowledge during the ERISA context, the courtroom focused on the term "genuine" from the statutory textual content.A selected difficulty also will invol

, the court docket seemed to start with the presumption that "knowledge" standing by itself could signify either genuine knowledge or constructive knowledge. In pinpointing that "knowledge" signifies only actual knowledge within the ERISA context, the court centered on the term "actual" in the statutory text.A specific situation also involves distr